Thursday, November 12, 2015

U.S. agents arrest members of Venezuelan President's family in Haiti

By Kay Guerrero and Claudia Dominguez, CNN
Two members of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's family are arrested
A DEA source says they were arrested in Haiti as they prepared to finalize drug deal
One of the men was raised by Venezuelan first lady Cilia Flores; the other one is her nephew (CNN)

U.S. federal agents have detained two members of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's family in Haiti, according to a Drug Enforcement Administration source who participated in the arrest.
The two men, identified as Efrain Antonio Campo Flores and Francisco Flores Freites, were arrested Tuesday night in the Haitian capital of Port-au-Prince as they were preparing to finalize a deal that would have allowed them to transport 800 kilograms of drugs to the United States, the source said.
One of the men was raised by Venezuelan first lady Cilia Flores; the other is her nephew.
Information about the arrest was corroborated by Mike Vigil, a former chief of international operations for the Drug Enforcement Administration who has contacts that are high-level federal law enforcement officials.
During the arrest, both men had Venezuelan diplomatic passports and openly identified themselves as the son and nephew of Flores, maintaining that they had diplomatic immunity, Vigil said.

CNN contacted Haitian authorities to ask about the arrest, but officials there said they were not involved in the raid. The Venezuelan government has not responded to requests for comment.

Maduro and Flores married in July 2013, several months after he was sworn in as Venezuela's President on the heels of the death of longtime leader Hugo Chavez.
But they'd been a couple for years, and both of them were members of Chavez' inner circle. During Chavez' final years in office, Maduro was vice president and foreign minister; Flores was the attorney general.
Now, rather than going by the title of first lady, Flores uses the term "first fighter" to describe her role.

CNN's Catherine E. Shoichet contributed to this report.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, March 9, 2015

Obama is protecting Venezuelan citizens against Maduro's dictatorship

Thank you president Obama, for this Executive Order... USA the only country talking about Human Rights Violations, and protecting Venezuelan cititizens from the abuse of Maduro's dictatorship!
Thanks again!!

For Immediate Release March 09, 2015
FACT SHEET: Venezuela Executive Order
President Obama today issued a new Executive Order (E.O.) declaring a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by the situation in Venezuela.  The targeted sanctions in the E.O. implement the Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Act of 2014, which the President signed on December 18, 2014, and also go beyond the requirements of this legislation.
We are committed to advancing respect for human rights, safeguarding democratic institutions, and protecting the U.S. financial system from the illicit financial flows from public corruption in Venezuela.
This new authority is aimed at persons involved in or responsible for the erosion of human rights guarantees, persecution of political opponents, curtailment of press freedoms, use of violence and human rights violations and abuses in response to antigovernment protests, and arbitrary arrest and detention of antigovernment protestors, as well as the significant public corruption by senior government officials in Venezuela.  The E.O. does not target the people or the economy of Venezuela.
Specifically, the E.O. targets those determined by the Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the Department of State, to be involved in:
  • actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions;
  • significant acts of violence or conduct that constitutes a serious abuse or violation of human rights, including against persons involved in antigovernment protests in Venezuela in or since February 2014;
  • actions that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or peaceful assembly; or
  • public corruption by senior officials within the Government of Venezuela. 

  • The E.O. also authorizes the Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the Department of State, to target any person determined:
  • to be a current or former leader of an entity that has, or whose members have, engaged in any activity described in the E.O. or of an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked or frozen pursuant to the E.O.; or
  • to be a current or former official of the Government of Venezuela;
  • Individuals designated or identified for the imposition of sanctions under this E.O., including the seven individuals that have been listed today in the Annex of this E.O., will have  their property and interests in property in the United States blocked or frozen, and U.S. persons are prohibited from doing business with them.  The E.O. also suspends the entry into the United States of individuals meeting the criteria for economic sanctions.
  • We will continue to work closely with others in the region to support greater political expression in Venezuela, and to encourage the Venezuelan government to live up to its shared commitment, as articulated in the OAS Charter, the Inter American Democratic Charter, and other relevant instruments related to democracy and human rights. 

The President imposed sanctions on the following seven individuals listed in the Annex to the E.O.:
1.      Antonio José Benavides Torres: Commander of the Strategic Region for the Integral Defense (REDI) of the Central Region of Venezuela’s Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) and former Director of Operations for Venezuela’s Bolivarian National Guard (GNB).
Benavides Torres is a former leader of the GNB, an entity whose members have engaged in significant acts of violence or conduct that constitutes a serious abuse or violation of human rights, including against persons involved in antigovernment protests in Venezuela in or since February 2014.  In various cities in Venezuela, members of the GNB used force against peaceful protestors and journalists, including severe physical violence, sexual assault, and firearms.
2.      Gustavo Enrique González López: Director General of Venezuela’s Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN) and President of Venezuela’s Strategic Center of Security and Protection of the Homeland (CESPPA).
González López is responsible for or complicit in, or responsible for ordering, controlling, or otherwise directing, or has participated in, directly or indirectly, significant acts of violence or conduct that constitutes a serious abuse or violation of human rights, including against persons involved in antigovernment protests in Venezuela in or since February 2014.  As Director General of SEBIN, he was associated with the surveillance of Venezuelan government opposition leaders. 
Under the direction of González López, SEBIN has had a prominent role in the repressive actions against the civil population during the protests in Venezuela.  In addition to causing numerous injuries, the personnel of SEBIN have committed hundreds of forced entries and extrajudicial detentions in Venezuela. 
3.      Justo José Noguera Pietri: President of the Venezuelan Corporation of Guayana (CVG), a state-owned entity, and former General Commander of Venezuela’s Bolivarian National Guard (GNB).
Noguera Pietri is a former leader of the GNB, an entity whose members have engaged in significant acts of violence or conduct that constitutes a serious abuse or violation of human rights, including against persons involved in antigovernment protests in Venezuela in or since February 2014.  In various cities in Venezuela, members of the GNB used excessive force to repress protestors and journalists, including severe physical violence, sexual assault, and firearms.
4.      Katherine Nayarith Haringhton Padron: national level prosecutor of the 20th District Office of Venezuela’s Public Ministry.
Haringhton Padron, in her capacity as a prosecutor, has charged several opposition members, including former National Assembly legislator Maria Corina Machado and, as of February 2015, Caracas Mayor Antonio Ledezma Diaz, with the crime of conspiracy related to alleged assassination/coup plots based on implausible - and in some cases fabricated - information. The evidence used in support of the charges against Machado and others was, at least in part, based on fraudulent emails.
5.      Manuel Eduardo Pérez Urdaneta: Director of Venezuela’s Bolivarian National Police.
Pérez Urdaneta is a current leader of the Bolivarian National Police, an entity whose members have engaged in significant acts of violence or conduct that constitutes a serious abuse or violation of human rights, including against persons involved in antigovernment protests in Venezuela in or since February 2014.  For example, members of the National Police used severe physical force against peaceful protesters and journalists in various cities in Venezuela, including firing live ammunition.
6.      Manuel Gregorio Bernal Martínez : Chief of the 31st Armored Brigade of Caracas of Venezuela’s Bolivarian Army and former Director General of Venezuela’s Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN).
Bernal Martínez was the head of SEBIN on February 12, 2014, when officials fired their weapons on protestors killing two individuals near the Attorney General’s Office.
7.      Miguel Alcides Vivas Landino: Inspector General of Venezuela’s Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) and former Commander of the Strategic Region for the Integral Defense (REDI) of the Andes Region of Venezuela’s Bolivarian National Armed Forces.
Vivas Landino is responsible for or complicit in, or responsible for ordering, controlling, or otherwise directing, or has participated in, directly or indirectly, significant acts of violence or conduct that constitutes a serious abuse or violation of human rights, including against persons involved in antigovernment protests in Venezuela in or since February 2014.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Latin America’s shameful silence on Venezuela

Maybe to be latinoamerican means supporting dictators, tyrants and drug traffickers ... if so, I am not latinoamerican anymore... I feel more like an American.
vdebate reporter

BY ANDRES OPPENHEIMER
AOPPENHEIMER@MIAMIHERALD.COM
02/21/2015
MEXICO CITY
Judging from the shamefully weak response from Latin America’s regional organizations such as the OAS and UNASUR to the arbitrary arrest of Caracas Mayor Antonio Ledezma and other opposition leaders in Venezuela, it’s hard not to conclude that they have become mutual protection societies for repressive regimes.
Instead of immediately requesting the unconditional release of Ledezma, as well as that of opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez and other political prisoners who according to the United Nations have been victims of “arbitrary arrests,” the biggest regional organizations and virtually all Latin American leaders have largely looked the other way.
What’s the point of having these regional organizations, if they don’t even raise a finger to enforce their own charters calling for the respect and defense of democracy? And how to justify the absence of strong responses from Brazil and Mexico, the region’s biggest countries, whose presidents want to be seen as leaders of modern democracies?
Decades ago, when a Latin American country blatantly infringed democratic freedoms, such as Venezuela is doing now, the region’s most important democratic leaders condemned such events, and asked for urgent meetings of the Organization of American States (OAS) to press for corrective actions.
When former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori shut down his country’s Congress in 1992, the then pro-democracy government of Venezuela broke diplomatic relations with Peru, Argentina withdrew its ambassador, and Chile and several other countries officially requested that Peru be suspended from the OAS. And the OAS protested Fujimori’s action, forcing him to eventually call early elections for a new Congress a few months later.
Nothing even close to that happened after Thursday’s arrest of Ledezma, one of Venezuela’s top elected officials and leading opposition figure. At the time of this writing, no Latin American government had issued a strong condemnation of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s arbitrary arrest of Ledezma, nor requested an urgent OAS foreign ministers’ meeting to address the issue.
Maduro, who only earlier this month led official celebrations to honor a 1992 coup attempt by late President Hugo Chávez, has accused Ledezma and other opposition leaders of “conspiring and organizing” violent anti-government actions, which they categorically deny.
On Friday, outgoing OAS Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza expressed his “alarm” over the latest events in Venezuela. But in the absence of any member country request to hold an extraordinary meeting, the group is basically watching Venezuelan events from afar.
The Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) announced Friday it will send a delegation of foreign ministers from Brazil, Ecuador and Colombia to Venezuela at a yet to be determined date to observe the situation on the ground.
That may be good news for Maduro, since UNASUR is the regional group most sympathetic to his government. Last year, UNASUR dispatched the same three countries’ foreign ministers to Venezuela for an alleged mediation effort after student protests in Caracas left at least 43 dead.
But the UNASUR mediators not only failed to broker an agreement between Maduro and the opposition, but helped Maduro win precious time to diffuse the protests. The three countries’ foreign ministers did not get the release of all students arrested during the protests, nor a commitment from Maduro to meet some basic demands, such as the appointment of independent electoral authorities for this year’s legislative elections.
Earlier, in 2013, UNASUR had rushed to bless Maduro’s dubious election victory, after a pro-government electoral tribunal had proclaimed him winner by 1 percent of the vote despite opposition charges of massive fraud.
UNASUR President Ernesto Samper called Friday for “dialogue” in Venezuela, and criticized U.S. sanctions against about five dozen Venezuelan officials suspected of human rights abuses and corruption.
Jose Miguel Vivanco, head of the Americas department of Human Rights Watch, called Samper’s statements “highly unfortunate, because there’s absolutely no connection between the rightful U.S. cancelation of visas and freezing of assets of Venezuelan officials involved in human rights abuses and corruption, and the arbitrary detentions in Venezuela.”
Vivanco added that “we are seeing a daily deterioration of fundamental freedoms in Venezuela. The government is not accountable to any independent democratic institution there. The only thing left to stop this escalade of abuses is the regional community.”
My opinion: I agree. Trouble is, the regional community is leaderless. It’s no surprise that Venezuela’s closest allies — the populist demagogues ruling in Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Argentina –— have remained silent.
What’s more difficult to understand is Mexico and Brazil’s failure to ask regional organizations to meet their duty and demand the respect for democratic institutions in all member countries.
Because of that, the OAS, UNASUR and other regional groups are increasingly looking as protectors of government abuses, rather than of democratic freedoms.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/andres-oppenheimer/article10886603.html#storylink=cpy

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

The New York Times Editorial: Mr. Maduro in His Labyrinth.

Opinion Pages | EDITORIAL
Mr. Maduro in His Labyrinth
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
JAN. 26, 2015
Framed portraits of the Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez were propped up at various stops of President Nicolás Maduro’s recent whirlwind trip abroad, as the man at the helm of the nation with the world’s largest oil reserves begged for bailouts.
Posters of his predecessor also abounded when Mr. Maduro, a former bus driver, arrived home to a carnival-like welcome, as he drove the lead coach of a convoy that snaked through crowds of supporters.
Last week, in a speech before lawmakers, Mr. Maduro, whose approval rating has slipped to 22 percent as the Venezuelan economy teeters on the brink of collapse, again invoked his mentor in predicting a landslide victory in upcoming parliamentary elections. “I have no doubt that Chávez’s nation will deliver a great victory in the memory of Hugo Chávez in elections that are being held this year,” he said.
Since he was voted into office in April 2013 by a minuscule margin after Mr. Chávez’s death, Mr. Maduro has leaned heavily on the legacy of his predecessor, a populist who governed poorly but had magnetic charisma and shrewd political instincts. Woefully lacking on both fronts, Mr. Maduro has become increasingly erratic and despotic in a quest for political survival that seems more daunting by the day. Healthy oil export revenue allowed Mr. Chávez to build a robust network of patronage and create generous welfare programs during his 14 years in power. Those are becoming increasingly paltry on Mr. Maduro’s watch.
The tumbling price of oil, which accounts for 95 percent of Venezuela’s export earnings, has nearly destroyed an economy that has been managed dismally for years. Inflation rose to 64 percent last year. On Wednesday, the International Monetary Fund predicted that Venezuela’s economy would contract 7 percent in 2015, which could force Mr. Maduro’s government to default on its loans or significantly curtail the subsidized oil his country provides to allies in the Caribbean, including Cuba.
Mr. Maduro has been vague about the type of painful economic measures his government has been willing to embrace, yet he bafflingly has promised to expand social programs and raise salaries. Far from acknowledging responsibility for the crisis, he and his loyalists have blamed the revenue shortfalls on political opponents they accuse of enabling an international conspiracy.
They have jailed one of the most prominent figures in the opposition, Leopoldo López, since last February on trumped up charges of stoking violent protests a year ago. During Mr. López’s Kafkaesque trial, which is still in process, prosecutors have argued that he instigated bloodshed through subliminal messages.
Last month, the authorities in Venezuela charged another opposition leader, María Corina Machado, with plotting to assassinate Mr. Maduro — a ludicrous, unfounded allegation against another inspiring challenger.
The crackdown on the opposition, unobstructed by a weak and compromised press, appears to be an effort to divert attention from Venezuelans’ deteriorating quality of life. Security forces have been deployed to maintain order outside supermarkets, where people line up for hours to scrounge whatever is left on depleted shelves.
On a recent afternoon, a Venezuelan woman who had been waiting in line since 4 a.m. showed a television journalist from Al Jazeera English her forearm, where someone had written the number 413 with a black marker to establish her place in line. “Now we are like cattle,” the woman lamented. “This must end.”
Hours later, Mr. Maduro’s government responded with its standard effort to find a scapegoat for the national calamity. The head of the National Assembly, Diosdado Cabello, in a televised address, called the journalist, Mónica Villamizar, an American spy.

Labels: , , , ,

Oil Cash Waning, Venezuelan shelves lie bare - New York Times

JAN. 29, 2015
CARACAS, Venezuela — Mary Noriega heard there would be chicken. She hated being herded “like cattle,” she said, standing for hours in a line of more than 1,500 people hoping to buy food, as soldiers with side arms checked identification cards to make sure no one tried to buy basic items more than once or twice a week.
But Ms. Noriega, a laboratory assistant with three children, said she had no choice, ticking off the inventory in her depleted refrigerator: coffee and corn flour. Things had gotten so bad, she said, that she had begun bartering with neighbors to put food on the table.
“We always knew that this year would start badly, but I think this is super bad,” Ms. Noriega said.
Traffic in Caracas, where inexpensive fuel keeps old gas guzzlers on the road.Venezuela May Meet New Reality, and New Price, at the PumpJAN. 20, 2014
Venezuelans have put up with shortages and long lines for years. But as the price of oil, the country’s main export, has plunged, the situation has grown so dire that the government has sent troops to patrol huge lines snaking for blocks. Some states have barred people from waiting outside stores overnight, and government officials are posted near entrances, ready to arrest shoppers who cheat the rationing system.
Because Venezuela is so dependent on oil sales to buy imports of food, medicine and many other basics, the drop in oil prices means that there is even less hard currency to buy what the country needs.
Even before oil prices tumbled, Venezuela was in the throes of a deep recession, with one of the world’s highest inflation rates and chronic shortages of basic items.
One of the nation’s most prestigious public hospitals shut down its heart surgery unit for weeks because of shortages of medical supplies. Some drugs have been out of stock for months, and at least one clinic performed heart operations only by smuggling in a vital drug from the United States. Diapers are so coveted that some shoppers carry the birth certificates of their children in case stores demand them.
Now economists predict that shortages will get even more acute and inflation, already 64 percent, will climb further. The price of Venezuelan oil dropped this month to $38 a barrel, down from $96 in September.
“Things are going to be even worse because oil keeps Venezuela going,” said Luis Castro, 42, a nurse, standing in line with hundreds of others at a grocery store. He had arrived with his wife and 6-year-old son at 6 a.m., but by 11:30 a.m., they had still not entered. “We’re getting used to standing on line,” he said, “and when you get used to something, they give you only crumbs.”
The shortages and inflation present another round of political challenges for President Nicolás Maduro, who has vowed to continue the Socialist-inspired revolution begun by his predecessor, the charismatic leftist Hugo Chávez.
“I’ve always been a Chavista,” said Ms. Noriega, using a term for a loyal Chávez supporter. But “the other day, I found a Chávez T-shirt I’d kept, and I threw it on the ground and stamped on it, and then I used it to clean the floor. I was so angry. I don’t know if this is his fault or not, but he died and left us here, and things have been going from bad to worse.”
Venezuela has the world’s largest estimated petroleum reserves, and when oil prices were high, oil exports made up more than 95 percent of its hard currency income. Mr. Chávez used the oil riches to fund social spending, like increased pensions and subsidized grocery stores. Now that income has been slashed.
“If things are so bad now, I really cannot imagine how they will be in February or March” when some of the lowest oil prices “materialize in terms of cash flow,” said Francisco J. Monaldi, a professor of energy policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
Mr. Maduro spent 14 straight days in January traveling the globe in an effort to court investment and persuade other oil-producing nations to cut production and push the price back up.
“We have serious economic difficulties regarding the country’s revenue,” Mr. Maduro said to the legislature during his annual address, which had to be pushed back because of the trip. “But God will always be with us. God will provide. And we will get, and we have gotten, the resources to maintain the country’s rhythm.”
After months of toying with the politically taboo idea of raising the price of gasoline sold at pumps here, the cheapest in the world, he said that the time had finally come to do so.
And he reiterated his position that the country’s economic ills are the fault of an economic war being waged against his government by right-wing enemies.
Many economists argue that government policies are a big part of the problem, including a highly overvalued currency, price controls that dissuade manufacturers and farmers, and government restrictions on access to dollars that have led to a steep drop in imports.
Some investors fear Venezuela will default on billions of dollars in bonds, but Mr. Maduro has said the country will pay its debts.
Typically, in an election year like this one, when voters will choose a new legislature, the government showers supporters with goods, like refrigerators and washing machines, or other benefits, like free housing. But now there may not be enough foreign currency to import appliances and construction materials.
In interviews, shoppers did not say they were going hungry. Rather, many said the economic crisis meant eating canned sardines instead of chicken, or boiled food instead of fried because vegetable oil is so hard to get. Many said they ate meat less frequently because it is out of stock or too expensive. Fresh fish can be harder to find, in part, fishermen said, because they find it more profitable to use their boats to sell subsidized Venezuelan diesel on the black market in a high-seas rendezvous instead of hauling in a catch.
But social media in Venezuela is full of urgent pleas from patients trying to find prescription medicine.
Dr. Gastón Silva, the head of cardiovascular surgery at the University Hospital of Caracas, said that because of medical shortages, only about 100 heart operations were performed there last year, down from 300 or more in previous years.
Some patients who had been hospitalized awaiting surgery for a month or more were sent home in November because there were not enough supplies, and the operating rooms remained shut for more than eight weeks, Dr. Silva said, despite a list of hundreds of people awaiting heart operations.
He said the shortages stemmed from the government’s foreign exchange controls, which have kept medical importers from getting access to the money they need to make purchases abroad. 
Now with the low price of oil further restricting the government’s supply of hard currency, he worried the crisis would get worse.“We are getting to a breaking point,” Dr. Silva said. “If one thing is lacking, O.K. If there are no automobile parts, we’ll see. Food, that’s problematic. But health care, that’s more problematic. Where will it end?”
Mr. Silva said that a private clinic where he also works had sharply scaled back heart surgeries in the last four months of 2014 because of limited supplies.
A heart surgeon at another private clinic said that a colleague had smuggled an essential drug from the United States to keep the operating room functioning.
Ana Guanipa, 75, a retired government office worker, said that she had searched numerous pharmacies for her hypertension medicine.
“I’ve been looking all month, and I can’t find it,” she said, adding that a neighbor who takes the same drug gave her some. “I take it one day on and one day off so that it will last longer.”
On a recent morning, hundreds of people stood in line outside a big-box store, similar to Costco. Inside, many shelves were stripped clean. The large appliance and electronics section was empty. One aisle displayed hundreds of boxes of a single brand of toothpaste. There was no fresh meat; a cooler was filled with frozen pigs feet.
Most people came to buy only three items sold at government-mandated prices: laundry detergent, vegetable oil and corn flour.
Most people came to buy only three items sold at government-mandated prices: laundry detergent, vegetable oil and corn flour.
Every purchase was entered into a database, ensuring that shoppers did not try to buy the same regulated staples at the chain for at least seven days.
Soldiers patrolled the line outside, police officers were stationed inside and government officials checked identification cards, looking for fake ones that could be used to cheat the rationing system — or for immigrants with expired visas. An official from the immigration and identification service said that offenders would be arrested.
“This is pathetic,” said Yenerly Niño, 18, adding that she had waited more than five hours to buy the three subsidized products because she could not afford to buy them at the higher prices charged by street vendors.
“You do what you have to,” she said. “If you don’t do it, you don’t eat.”

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Venezuelan complaining about shortages...

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Detention of @inesitaterrible by SEBIN in Venezuela aggravates Freedom in Venezuela

Detention of  @inesitaterrible by SEBIN aggravates Freedom of expression in Venezuela. It shows clearly that Venezuela is under a dictatorship - Maduro

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Protest against Maduro - Protesta a Maduro - New York - San Francisco

Venezuelans in New York and San Francisco will be raising their voices to the world  to denounce the repression, torture, human rights violations, and deaths for violence in Venezuela.
Venezolanos en New York y San Francisco estaran alzando sus voces para denunciar ante el mundo la represión, las torturas, la violación de los derechos humanos, y las muertes por violencia en Venezuela.
Hastag:    #LaCAUSAesVzlaONU26S

New York:

Venezuelans in New York are inviting to a protest against Venezuelan President, Nicolas Maduro, tomorrow Friday 26th:
Date:          September 26th, 2014
Time:         12:00pm - 4:00pm
Location:   In front of the United Nations (47th Street & 1st Avenue).

Venezolanos en New York están invitando a una protesta en contra del presidente de Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, mañana viernes 26:
Día:            26 de Septiembre
Hora:        12:00pm - 4:00pm
Lugar:      Sede de la ONU, Calle 47 con Primera Avenida - New York.

San Francisco, California:

Venezuelans in San Francisco will be protesting against Venezuelan President, Nicolás Maduro, marching:
Date:          September 26th, 2014
Time:         12:00pm - 2:00pm
Location:   March from the Simón Bolívar Statue in the UN Plaza to San Francisco Civil Center.

Venezolanos en San Francisco protestarán al presidente de Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, marchando:.
Dia:           26 de Septiembre
Hora:       12:00pm - 2:00pm
Lugar:      Marcha desde la estatua de Simón Bolívar en la UN Plaza hasta el Civic Center, San Francisco, CA

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, September 12, 2014

Should Venezuela Default?

CAMBRIDGE – Will Venezuela default on its foreign bonds? Markets fear that it might. That is why Venezuelan bonds pay over 11 percentage points more than US Treasuries, which is 12 times more than Mexico, four times more than Nigeria, and double what Bolivia pays. Last May, when Venezuela made a $5 billion private placement of ten-year bonds with a 6% coupon, it effectively had to give a 40% discount, leaving it with barely $3 billion. The extra $2 billion that it will have to pay in ten years is the compensation that investors demand for the likelihood of default, in excess of the already hefty coupon.
Venezuela’s government needs to pay $5.2 billion in the first days of October. Will it? Does it have the cash on hand? Will it raise the money by hurriedly selling CITGO, now wholly owned by Venezuela’s state oil company, PDVSA?
A different question is whether Venezuela should pay. Granted, what governments should do and what they will do are not always independent questions, because people often do what they should. But “should” questions involve some kind of moral judgment that is not central to “will” questions, which makes them more complex. 
One point of view holds that if you can make good on your commitments, then that is what you should do. That is what most parents teach their children.
But the moral calculus becomes a bit more intricate when you cannot make good on all of your commitments and have to decide which to honor and which to avoid. To date, under former President Hugo Chávez and his successor, Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela has opted to service its foreign bonds, many of which are held by well-connected wealthy Venezuelans.
Yordano, a popular Venezuelan singer, probably would have a different set of priorities. He was diagnosed with cancer earlier this year and had to launch a social-media campaign to locate the drugs that his treatment required. Severe shortages of life-saving drugs in Venezuela are the result of the government’s default on a $3.5 billion bill for pharmaceutical imports.
A similar situation prevails throughout the rest of the economy. Payment arrears on food imports amount to $2.4 billion, leading to a substantial shortage of staple goods. In the automobile sector, the default exceeds $3 billion, leading to a collapse in transport services as a result of a lack of spare parts. Airline companies are owed $3.7 billion, causing many to suspend activities and overall service to fall by half.
In Venezuela, importers must wait six months after goods have cleared customs to buy previously authorized dollars. But the government has opted to default on these obligations, too, leaving importers with a lot of useless local currency. For a while, credit from foreign suppliers and headquarters made up for the lack of access to foreign currency; but, given mounting arrears and massive devaluations, credit has dried up.
The list of defaults goes on and on. Venezuela has defaulted on PDVSA’s suppliers, contractors, and joint-venture partners, causing oil exports to fall by 45% relative to 1997 and production to amount to about half what the 2005 plan had projected for 2012.
In addition, Venezuela’s central bank has defaulted on its obligation to maintain price stability by nearly quadrupling the money supply in 24 months, which has resulted in a 90% decline in the bolivar’s value on the black market and the world’s highest inflation rate. To add insult to injury, since May the central bank has defaulted on its obligation to publish inflation and other statistics.
Venezuela functions with four exchange rates, with the difference between the strongest and the weakest being a factor of 13. Unsurprisingly, currency arbitrage has propelled Venezuela to the top ranks of global corruption indicators.
All of this chaos is the consequence of a massive fiscal deficit that is being financed by out-of-control money creation, financial repression, and mounting defaults – despite a budget windfall from $100-a-barrel oil. Instead of fixing the problem, Maduro’s government has decided to complement ineffective exchange and price controls with measures like closing borders to stop smuggling and fingerprinting shoppers to prevent “hoarding.” This constitutes a default on Venezuelans’ most basic freedoms, which Bolivia, Ecuador, and Nicaragua – three ideologically kindred countries that have a single exchange rate and single-digit inflation – have managed to preserve.
So, should Venezuela default on its foreign bonds? If the authorities adopted common-sense policies and sought support from the International Monetary Fund and other multilateral lenders, as most troubled countries tend to do, they would rightly be told to default on the country’s debts. That way, the burden of adjustment would be shared with other creditors, as has occurred in Greece, and the economy would gain time to recover, particularly as investments in the world’s largest oil reserves began to bear fruit. Bondholders would be wise to exchange their current bonds for longer-dated instruments that would benefit from the upturn.
None of this will happen under Maduro’s government, which lacks the capacity, political capital, and will to move in this direction. But the fact that his administration has chosen to default on 30 million Venezuelans, rather than on Wall Street, is not a sign of its moral rectitude. It is a signal of its moral bankruptcy.
Read more at http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/ricardo-hausmann-and-miguel-angel-santos-pillory-the-maduro-government-for-defaulting-on-30-million-citizens--but-not-on-wall-street#CtfzrtcQeF7y8kCp.99

Labels: , , , , ,

Venezuela Threatens Harvard Professor for Default Comment

I will trust more Ricardo Hausmann than Nicolas Maduro - vdebate reporter
Maduro threatens Harvard Professor for default comment
By Jose Orozco and Sebastian Boyd
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro instructed the attorney general and public prosecutor to take “actions” against Harvard Professor Ricardo Hausmann, saying the economist sought to destabilize the country by suggesting the government default on its debt.
Maduro lashed out at Hausmann during a televised address last night, calling him a “financial hitman” and “outlaw” who forms part of a campaign “that has been initiated around the world against Venezuela.” He didn’t specify what actions he had asked the attorney general and prosecutor to take.
Venezuelan bonds tumbled earlier this week after Hausmann co-wrote an opinion piece on Sept. 5 with a Harvard colleague arguing the country should consider defaulting because it had already racked up billions of dollars of arrears with importers. Widespread shortages of everything from toilet paper to medicine have helped fuel the world’s fastest inflation.
Maduro’s speech was “the despotic diatribe of a tropical thug,” Hausmann said by phone today. “This is Exhibit A in how Venezuela is not a democracy. He uses his position as head of state to intimidate people who think differently.”
The president’s office, the attorney general and the information ministry didn’t immediately reply to e-mails seeking comment on what actions were planned against Hausmann. Born in Venezuela, the professor served as planning minister in the 1990s under the president that Maduro’s mentor and predecessor, the late Hugo Chavez, tried to topple in a coup attempt. He has lived in the U.S. since 1994.

Previous Crackdowns
Maduro and Chavez have jailed opponents in the past. National Guard troops arrested opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez in February following protests that left five people dead, accusing him of inciting violence. Former Defense Minister Raul Baduel, who served as a paratrooper with Chavez before being jailed after breaking with the government, is among a group of political opponents serving an eight-year sentence.
In the interview today, Hausmann reiterated his comments from the Project Syndiate opinion piece that Venezuela has already defaulted on importers and suppliers while noting that the country’s constitution guarantees freedom of speech.
“The question is not will Venezuela default or not,” he said today. “Venezuela already has defaulted. The question is who gets paid. Venezuela is only paying Wall Street."
The country’s benchmark bonds due 2027 sank 3.6 cents to 70.08 on the dollar on Sept. 8, driving their yield up to a six-month high of 14.4 percent, as Hausmann’s comments added to investor concern about a nation that saw its foreign reserves sink to an 11-year low last month.

Bonds Recover
Venezuela’s debt has rebounded the past four sessions, with the benchmark securities climbing above 74 cents as of 9:32 a.m. in New York, as Maduro sought to reassure creditors. On Sept. 10, he told a television audience that the government would meet its “international obligations completely, down to the last dollar.”
While the bonds are rebounding, they remain the most expensive sovereign debt to insure against default in the world, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Investors pay 14.33 percent annually for protection against non-payment over five years, a rate that implies a greater than 60 percent chance of default during that period.
In his speech last night, Maduro made reference to Hausmann’s role in the government of then-President Carlos Andres Perez. It was Perez’s fiscal austerity and free-market measures that triggered rioting and street protests and led to the coup attempt in February 1992 that made Chavez a public figure in Venezuela. Hausmann was appointed minister in a reshuffle after the coup.

Economic Damage
“You’re the top adviser, Ricardo Hausmann, of all these groups that want to inflict economic damage” on Venezuela, Maduro said. “Of course, because you live in your mansions over there” in the U.S., he said.
Hausmann denied receiving payment for his comments or having links with investors interested in driving down Venezuelan bonds.
Maduro’s threats are “evidence of an outlaw government, a rogue state,” Hausmann said.
Hausmann was the first chief economist of the Inter-American Development Bank. While there he and Barry Eichengreen developed the concept of “original sin” to describe how emerging-market borrowers with weak domestic capital markets are forced to borrow in hard currency. The currency depreciation then makes it harder for them to pay debt back should they run into trouble. Eichengreen teaches at the University of California at Berkeley.
Hausmann discloses his consultancy work on Harvard’s website. Last year he spoke at conferences organized by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and UBS AG.
To contact the reporters on this story: Jose Orozco in Caracas at jorozco8@bloomberg.net; Sebastian Boyd in Santiago at sboyd9@bloomberg.netTo contact the editors responsible for this story: David Papadopoulos at papadopoulos@bloomberg.net Brendan Walsh

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Obama - Venezuelans need your support to bring democracy to their country

By Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) - 03/24/14 
The palpable absence of a coordinated strategy in support of the pro-democracy advocates in Venezuela is evident and yet another in a string of missed opportunities by the Obama administration to promote U.S. interests and freedom around the world.
For longer than a month now, a crisis in Venezuela has been escalating, but the stage for this had been set with the death of Hugo Chavez last March and the contested presidential elections that followed. Now, according to Venezuelan non-governmental organizations, the regime of President Nicolás Maduro is responsible for almost 30 killed, nearly 60 reported cases of torture, more than 1,500 people unjustly detained, and hundreds injured with very little attention from the Obama administration and with no reasonable end in sight.
The attacks against the Venezuelan people by the Maduro regime also have serious links to Cuba, a U.S. designated state sponsor of terrorism. The Castro regime uses military advisers and Cuban troops to help the Maduro regime suppress the calls of the Venezuelan people for democracy, freedom and human rights.
Furthermore, the Venezuelan mayors of San Cristobal and San Diego, and opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez have been unjustly arrested. And Diosdado Cabello — one of the country’s most dangerous goons — has threatened that another opposition leader, Maria Corina Machado, may be arrested and charged with bogus accusations as well.
On March 13, Secretary of State John Kerry testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and to my disappointment but not to my surprise, he failed to address the situation in Venezuela in both his written testimony and opening statement to the committee.  This lack of attention to this crisis is insulting and represents the foreign policy strategy of the Obama administration to stick their heads in the sand and hope these problems go away by themselves. When I pressed Kerry on Venezuela during the hearing, he responded that it is time for the Organization of American States (OAS), and neighboring countries, to focus on Venezuela and hold Maduro accountable.
I can only assume that Kerry forgot that the OAS has already tried to focus on Venezuela and failed miserably. On March 7, the OAS passed a watered-down declaration that failed to hold the Maduro regime accountable, which precipitated the U.S. permanent representative, as well as the Canadian and Panamanian representatives, to vote against this weak declaration. The lack of U.S. leadership in our region has only emboldened these tyrants to violate human rights with impunity.
Maduro’s bullying tactics have even extended as far north as Washington, D.C. On March 21, the OAS was set to convene an ordinary session of the Permanent Council, and Panama was willing to allow Machado to address the council as a member of its delegation. But Maduro and his Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America lackeys, such as Nicaragua, quickly moved to make the session private. Then the Venezuelan delegation successfully managed to lobby the council to remove the topic of the Venezuelan crisis from the agenda. Yet perplexingly, the administration falsely believes that the OAS shares our concern over Venezuela.
When Honduran officials acted in 2009 to remove former President Manuel Zelaya, in accordance with the country’s constitution, the U.S. led the effort to expel Honduras from the OAS and revoked visas of Honduran nationals. Yet, when students are being killed in the streets of Caracas by the Maduro regime, the Obama administration echoes the same hollow words and responds with no action.
The president has issued an executive order to sanction individuals who have undermined the democratic process and threatened the security of Ukraine, but no similar order has been signed to target Venezuelan officials who have acted in the same manner. And so, if the Obama administration will not act, Congress will lead the way.
Last week, I introduced, alongside more than a dozen congressional colleagues, a bipartisan bill: H.R. 4229, the Venezuelan Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act. It calls on the president to impose targeted sanctions on Venezuelan officials who have committed or have been complicit in human rights violations by denying them visas to enter our country, blocking their property, freezing their assets and prohibiting them from conducting financial transactions in the United States.
This bill will neither hurt the people of Venezuela, nor will it impact the Venezuelan economy. Instead, it is targeted to those Venezuelan officials who have fired rubber bullets and tear gas into crowds and those who are responsible for human rights violations. In response to this legislation, Maduro has blamed my colleagues and me for Venezuela’s ills. This is just another attempt by Maduro to distract from his failed policies that have caused staggering inflation and food shortages. It is a badge of honor to be attacked by an autocrat who disdains basic democratic principles.
Ros-Lehtinen has represented Florida’s 27th Congressional District since 1990. She sits on the Rules and the Foreign Affairs committees, and is chairwoman of that panel’s subcommittee on the Middle East and North Africa.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 23, 2014

What's going on in Venezuela in a nutshell (English version)

Very good video about Venezuela situation...

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, March 22, 2014

Machado exposes the Venezuelan Dictatorship

Taken from La Patilla
Despite having the right to speak, blocked and banned from the Organization of American States, and singing the National Anthem, Maria Corina Machado exposed the realities of having "petroamigos" at the highest levels, by not allowing her to speak for more than half of people in her country,  Machado exposes the Venezuelan dictatorship.


Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Maria Corina Machado responds to Unasur

María Corina Machado responds to Unasur

Is my duty as parliamentary react to Resolution No. 2014, issued by UNASUR foreign ministers in Santiago meeting in Santiago, Chile, this March 12. Finally UNASUR decided to issue a statement to, after more than thirty long days of serious conflict in Venezuela, to protect the regime, not the Venezuelans. In over a month of peaceful democratic protest there are 25 dead, over 300 injured, over 1,300 arrested and 40 documented cases of torture.
I consider extremely seriously that UNASUR has not made any reference to the brutal repression by the Venezuelan regime. Not a word to the murdered of citizens by death squads paid and supported by the government, or the students massacred by paramilitary groups, arrests without warrants, torture, although everything is fully recorded and disseminated through social networks and international media.
We are still waiting in that the UNASUR Parliament fulfill the commitment made on 19 April 2013, to promote a review of our presidential elections, then denounced as fraudulent. Nicolas Maduro has violated each of its commitments, and UNASUR with its silence and inaction has validated all his actions.
The resolution UNASUR / RSMC No. 2014, is a disgrace and contrasts with the announcement made yesterday by a large group of Latin American parliamentarians, which will accuse Nicolas Maduro for crimes against humanity before the International Criminal Court in The Hague, for the cruel and inhuman repression exercised since 12 February.
Chancellors of UNASUR, is obligatory to think before endorse a regime that massively and systematically has violated human rights and has made the repression and torture a state policy . We agree with UNASUR, his concern for the independence and sovereignty of Venezuela, for that reason we repudiate the Cuban interference in our security agencies, intelligence and identification and demand the immediate expulsion of the Cuban military in our national armed forces.

(Translated by Rosalba G.)

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Marco Rubio talks about how Cuba exports terrorism to Venezuela

We want Cubans out of Venezuela; they are only corrupting our system, bringing the poverty,  and killing citizens with them. #CubansGoHome #SOSVenezuela

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Brutal beating of students Venezuelan police

What is going on in Venezuela? - a nutshell - Video

What is going on in Venezuela...a nutshell


Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, January 31, 2014

Only in Venezuela

It is the same country I growth up? It doesn't seems like any more :-(
Caracas, La Trinidad...



Labels: ,

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

How Did Venezuela Become So Violent?

http://fusion.net/leadership/story/venezuela-violent-iraq-365361http://
In the early hours of Monday, Monica Spear became another one of Venezuela's murder victims. The actress and former beauty queen was killed along with her husband during a highway robbery attempt, with her five year old daughter looking on from the back seat of the car as her parents were shot to death.
Because of Spear's fame, and the tragic nature of this murder, the story spread rapidly online and on TV, prompting Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro to call for a special, high-level meeting on the country's security situation. 
Maduro may be trying to do something about Venezuela's crime problem. But this incident also highlights an inconvenient truth for the Venezuelan government. Under the socialist government of Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro, Venezuela has become one of the world's most violent countries. The leaders of that country have spectacularly failed to stop the violence.
This chart of Venezuela's murder rate was compiled by the Venezuelan Violence Observatory, a local think tank. The red line indicates the number of murders per every 100,000 residents.
As you can see, the murder rate in Venezuela has been increasing dramatically since 1999, the year in which Hugo Chavez took office in Venezuela. Murder rates grew through out Hugo Chavez's 13 year tenure, and have continued to climb under that of his successor, Nicolas Maduro.
Venezuela's murder rate now dwarfs those of Mexico or Colombia, countries that have suffered heavily from drug violence in the past decade. Here's a comparison of murder rates in different countries compiled with data from the Venezuelan Violence Observatory and a UN database on global homicide rates:
In 2013 Venezuela also had more violent deaths than Iraq, a country plagued by terrorist attacks and sectarian violence.
So why has Venezuela become so violent?
There are several hypothesis.
One of them is that in Venezuela, criminals have little incentive to change their behavior. Think tanks estimate that only 8% of crimes in Venezuela are prosecuted. This means that murderers, robbers and the like, have a 92% chance of breaking the law and getting away with it.

Venezuelan criminologist Fermin Marmol, says that the government has not prioritized security policies, like flushing out corrupt cops, and increasing the number of well trained prosecutors.
"They have prioritized other things like changing the constitution and exporting the [Bolivarian] revolution," Marmol told Venezuelan newspaper El Universal.
The government says it has tried some security initiatives, including sending the military to patrol the most dangerous parts of Venezuelan cities. When Chavez was alive, he argued that high poverty rates in the 1990s led to broken homes, and the abandonment of kids who are now leading lives of crime.
But many Latin American countries such as Colombia and Mexico also suffered from high poverty rates in the 1990s, and homicide rates in these places are actually going down now.
Some sociologists say that violence in Venezuela is also fueled by class rivalries, which the government promotes in its discourses and TV programs. These analysts argue that by labeling its middle class opponents as "terrorists," "traitors" and "enemies of the state," the government incites violence against these people, giving gangsters from poor neighborhoods a psychological justification for assaulting middle class Venezuelans.
The government denies that it is stoking violence. It argues instead that violence is promoted by materialistic TV shows, and action films like Spiderman, which trivialize death.
Fermin Marmol says the government has a "contradictory" discourse towards gun control, urging gangsters to give up their weapons, while on the other hand encouraging the formation of socialist militias in poor neighborhoods.
He argues that drug trafficking in Venezuelan neighborhoods has increased violence, and claims that a new sort of criminal that is not just looking for goods or money has emerged.
According to Marmol, gaining respect is also extremely important to this "new" sort of criminal. These criminals, who are generally teenagers or men in their early twenties, are willing to kill to gain the "respect" of their peers, Marmol says. They will also see any resistance to robbery as an act of "disrespect" towards them that ought to be punished with violence.

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, November 15, 2013

Venezuelan Revolution at Full Throttle

From the Editors of VenEconomy
If you thought things in Venezuela could not get any worse, you must be realizing by now how wrong you were.
Over the past few weeks, the country’s political situation, social environment and morals of citizens have been sinking into what it seems a bottomless pit at the same pace as the economy has been deteriorating.
On Tuesday, for instance, the National Assembly (namely, the Congress) is getting ready to withdraw the parliamentary immunity from María Mercedes Aranguren, a lawmaker from the Venezuelan opposition, as requested by the Supreme Court (TSJ), which is looking to bring her to trial for “alleged corruption, money laundering and criminal association as prescribed by the Organic Law against Organized Crime.” This is an accusation needed by the Government so it can pull a parliamentary majority required to grant special powers to President Nicolás Maduro so he can deepen a communist process in Venezuela.
One of the main aspects of this move is that the Government is requesting these special powers to fight “corruption and an ongoing economic war” and will turn to bribery to the end of “buying” the much-needed “lawmaker 99” that would buy the missing vote to pass this decree. This “lawmaker 99” will carry over his/her shoulders the fact of handing over the future of the country to a ruler who has no boundaries in curtailing the constitutional rights of Venezuelans, as long as he follows the Castro recipe to dominate the entire nation.
The truth is Maduro does not need this enabling law to fight the corruption that has taken hold during the revolutionary government. If he wanted to fight corruption, it would only take to apply existing laws and let the public powers do their thing without any political hues. But at present there is no autonomous moral power, or judiciary power or even a legislative power to hold the Executive accountable for looting the public purse and squandering the resources belonging to the population.
Neither does Maduro require special powers to fight a fictional economic war that he made up himself. There are countless existing laws, controls and ruling and inspection bodies that are capable of controlling, taking remedial actions and sanctioning those acting above the law in their entrepreneurial, business and personal activities.
The reality is that Maduro is requesting an enabling law so he can have a blank check that allows him to deepen the communist project started by the late Hugo Chávez in Venezuela. He wants to have a free path so he can finish destroying the country’s private sector and have total control over the productive sector from beginning to end and with no accountability whatsoever.
The events over the weekend, in which on a national TV and radio broadcast the ruler demanded to see empty shelves at major home appliances stores across the country that were subject to inspections after alleged usury, may be unleashing demons hard to contain in a country that has been tolerating economic and social limitations for quite some time. Today, several stores have been looted by some wild hordes of people, who Diosdado Cabello (the head of the National Assembly) calls a “popular organization.” Other retail stores have opted to close their doors in the event of a “mishap,” as some locals call the act of looting nowadays. Some 28 owners and managers from those retail stores have been detained by authorities; the Public Ministry has issued some 10 arrest warrants and has “temporarily” taken over three establishments.
It is quite worrisome the announcement of the creation of a special prosecuting office aimed at fighting usury, which seems to lead to the execution of summary trials, without right to defense or presumption of innocence. Who is going to invest amid this chaos? If the Government keeps moving forward with its plan, it will be worthless if it prohibits the people to talk about the shortages, lootings, inflation, unofficial dollar rates or just about any subject that has already been banned by the Government.
It is quite worrisome that when controlled sales finish off the inventories of inspected retailers, irate people may want to go there again for more.
It is worrisome as well that Maduro is calling the “Popular Power” and militias to step out into the streets to provide support to “civil, military and police authorities.” Making brothers fight against each other has always been a recipe that never has tasted any good.
VenEconomy has been a leading provider of consultancy on financial, political and economic data in Venezuela since 1982.

Labels: , , , , , , ,